class: bottom, left, inverse, title-slide .title[ # ReproHack:
Practicing Research Reproducibility
] .author[ ### Alessandro Gasparini · alessandro.gasparini(at)ki.se ] .date[ ### Open Access Week · 2022-10-24 ] --- <script type="text/x-mathjax-config"> MathJax.Hub.Config({ TeX: { Macros: { '\\_': '_' } } }); </script> <style> .center2 { margin: 0; position: absolute; top: 50%; left: 50%; -ms-transform: translate(-50%, -50%); transform: translate(-50%, -50%); } </style> # Introduction We have seen in the previous talk examples of research reproducibility in practice. Specifically: - Evidence of a higher share of reported vs expected positive findings; -- - _Researcher degrees of freedom_; -- - _Multi-analyst_ studies. --- # The Replication Crisis <img src="20221024-open-access-week-reprohack_files/figure-html/pmplot-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .small[ PubMed Query: '_"replication crisis" OR "replicability crisis" OR "reproducibility crisis"_'. <br/> Data extracted on 2022-10-18. ] --- class: middle, center, inverse # What can I do as a researcher? --- class: middle, center # Learn --- class: middle, center # Advocate --- class: middle, center # Practice --- class: middle, center, inverse ## The previous talk mentioned <br/> _practice_ and _community_. -- ## <br/> This is what I will be talking about here. --- # The Importance of Practice According to Swedish psychologist [K. Anders Ericsson](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K._Anders_Ericsson): > [...] we argue that the differences between expert performers and normal adults reflect a life-long period of deliberate effort to improve performance in a specific domain. .footnote[ K. Anders Ericsson _et al_. _The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance._ Psychological Review 1993, Vol. 100. No. 3, 363-406 ] -- Three key points: * [...] **expert performers** * [...] **life-long period** * [...] **deliberate effort** --- class: middle, center <img src="practice-feedback-loop.jpg" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- class: center, middle, inverse # Enter _ReproHack_ --- class: center, middle # What is a ReproHack? --- # ReproHack: A Sandbox Environment for Practicing Research Reproducibility <img src="ws.png" width="65%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- class: middle, center <img src="ReproducibleVsReplicable.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- class: middle .footnote[ Source: https://www.reprohack.org ] > During a ReproHack, participants attempt to **reproduce** published research of their choice from a list of proposed papers with **publicly available** associated **code** and **data**. --- class: middle .footnote[ Source: https://www.reprohack.org ] > .grey[During a ReproHack, participants attempt to **reproduce** published research of their choice from a list of proposed papers with **publicly available** associated **code** and **data**.] > Participants get to work with other people’s material in a low-pressure environment and **record their experiences** on a number of key aspects, including **reproducibility**, **transparency** and **reusability** of materials. --- class: middle .footnote[ Source: https://www.reprohack.org ] > .grey[During a ReproHack, participants attempt to **reproduce** published research of their choice from a list of proposed papers with **publicly available** associated **code** and **data**.] > .grey[Participants get to work with other people’s material in a low-pressure environment and **record their experiences** on a number of key aspects, including **reproducibility**, **transparency** and **reusability** of materials.] > At the end of the day we **regroup**, **share** our experiences and give **feedback** to the authors. --- class: middle, center # Note: _ReproHacks are by no means an attempt to criticise or discredit work._ --- class: middle, center <img src="practice-feedback-loop.jpg" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- <img src="CommunityNetwork.jpg" width="59%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # Benefits of ReproHack ### For authors: * Feedback on the reproducibility of your work * Appreciation for your efforts in making your work reproducible. * Opportunity to engage others with your research. -- ### For participants: * Practical experience in reproducibility with real published materials. * Opportunity to explore different tools and strategies. * Opportunity for meaningful contributions. * Inspiration to work more openly. --- # ReproHack: <br/> Building Communities of Practice in Research Reproducibility * Help build **capacity** in reproducibility throughout the research community. * Highlight community **value** of reproducibility beyond validation of results. * Help the community **evaluate** how successful current practices are and for what purpose. * Help **identify** what works and where the most pressing weaknesses in our approaches are. --- class: center, middle <img src="Community.jpg" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # I'm Sold! # How Do I Get Involved? -- * Check out the website: https://www.reprohack.org - Resources, - Current events, - ... -- * Join the Slack: https://reprohack-autoinvite.herokuapp.com -- * Join the discourse on Twitter: https://twitter.com/reprohack -- * [Organise](https://www.reprohack.org/organiser_guidelines) your own ReproHack! --- class: center, middle <img src="CultureShift.jpg" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- .center2[ <img src="BannerThanks.jpg" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] .footnote[ Slides available online: https://tinyurl.com/oaweek-ki-2022 <br/> Illustrations created by Scriberia with The Turing Way community. <br/> Used under a CC-BY 4.0 licence. DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.3332807](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3332807) ]